Matty Doolin

Matty Doolin: 700 Headwords Author: Oxford Bookworms Library Summary:Â   Matty is fifteen and is leaving school in a few weeks time. He wants to work with animal, and would like to get a job on a farm. But his parents say he is too young to leave home – he must stay in the town and get a job in ship-building, like his father. They also say he can't go on a camping holiday with his friends. And they say he can't keep his dog, Nelson, because Nelson barks all day and eats his father's shoes. But it is because of Nelson that Matty finds a new life026 The Plot:Â   is very nice and easy, so I could follow easily the plot of this novel. Characters: 1)Â   The main character in the story is a boy his name is Matty and he is fifteen years old, who has a dog his name is Nelson. 2)Â   The second main character is Nelson, because of Nelson that Matty finds a new life. Basically, it all began because of Nelson. 3)Â   Matty's parents, Mr. And Mrs. Doolin, especially his mother Mrs. Doolin, that she pushed Nelson out into the street, so Nelson died because of her, but she didn't mean that, she was angry from Matty because Matty stayed out all day, and the dog was barking for hours while she was waiting for him, so she pushed Nelson out into the street, then the car hit him. 4)Â   Mr. Funnell. He was Matty's teacher in the school, but he also helped the children to find jobs when they left school. 5)Â   Willie and Joe, they are Matty's friends. Also, the camping holiday was Willies's plan. He, Matty, and Joe were best friends. 6)Â   Mr. Walsh, the farmer and Mrs. Walsh and her daughter Jessica, and Mr. Walsh's the two sheep dogs, the bigger dog her name is Betsy and the other one, her son, Prince. Subplots: 1)Â   Staying out all day including the story of Nelson's death. 2)Â   Going for their first long walk. 3)Â   The storms story. 4)Â   The Matty's first real day on a farm. 5)Â   Matty and Jessica, having a talk in the barn. 6)Â   The story of Matty and Jessica's adventure on the hills. Action: the action of the story is very interesting and dramatic. There are six basic actions: 1)Â   Matty and Nelson 2)Â   Camping 3)Â   Blisters and storms 4)Â   Helping on the farm )Â   A night on the hills 6)Â   A new life for Matty Themes: Kindness, love, respect, cooperation, and helping are the main themes of the novel. Moral: The moral of the story is that if you want something in this life, you have to work to get it. Opinion: In my opinion, Matty was not young to leave home, because Mr. and Mrs. Walsh will be life second parents to him. In addition, he will be very happy in his job, because he loves animals and he loves the hills and mountains. But, I think, at fifteen, nobody really knows what he wants to do. Also, perhaps Matty will be bore with his job after a few or many years.

Marx, Weber, and Rousseau

The establishment of modern society is tied closely to the common line of thought expressed by modern thinkers like Marx, Weber, and Rousseau. These men all had complicated ideas in regards to the formation of modern society, but they all addressed certain aspects of that development. They all focused their studies on human nature and specifically, how human beings came to live out some of the goofy ideas that are now commonplace. Among those was the important premise of personal property. Modern human society places a great deal of importance on gaining things and this is something that is certainly not new. In fact, it has been around since very early on. Even more important than the material possessions is the actual strife to gain these things, which human beings seem to take great solace in. The overriding characteristics of modern human society can be closely tied to the theories presented by these famed thinkers. They hold similar ideas on how society developed as a result of the acquisition of personal property, and from those ideas, one can quickly gather insight about the overall development of modern society. Marx had his own ideas on personal property that have become something of a resource guide for other thinkers and government formers alike. Karl Marx is a highly misunderstood figure among the American public, because most people are quick to associate him and his ideas to communist ideals. Even though many of his theories were eventually used to found communist nations, it cannot be denied that Marx was a brilliant economist and well rounded thinker. Marx had his own particular opinions on personal property and the accumulation of wealth and he was not shy about sharing those ideas with other people. Marx found capitalistic society to be something that was destined to fail for a few reasons. In his writings, he indicated the price based competition in business would force small businesses out of the mix and would eventually lead to lower wages for people, as big business controls the activity. Marx was not completely right about a lot of his theories in regards to modern society, but he did hit the nail on the head on a few things. Marx had strong feelings on the issue of private property as it relates to the development of a society. He was always of the opinion that human nature was a drastically shifting thing, but it stood strong on a few different foundations. Human beings might change their feelings on a lot of things, but according to Karl Marx, they would never stop with the striving to work hard for their possessions. Work, to Marx, was a much more important aspect of society’s underlying nature than the actual possessions that come as a result of that work. That is why much of Marxism is based upon the theory of work. People in society can not survive without it, even if they have the possessions that they desire. According to Marxism, people will always want to acquire more things than they already have. That is why work is so important to the development of society, in addition to acquiring things in society. Though Marx and fellow thinker Max Webber do not completely agree on the issue of personal property, they do share many of the same underlying beliefs on its role in the development of modern society as it is known today. While Karl Marx held onto the belief that possessions were not the end all for people in modern society, Max Weber felt strongly that they were an important part of what he referred to as The Spirit of Capitalism. Anyone who has studied the thoughts of Max Weber knows that much of his theory is based upon religious things. To him, they played an important role in the shaping of modern society in addition to the economic factors that were so prevalent. That creates a very interesting paradox in his line of thinking. Most of the time, the pursuit of material possessions did not go along with the pursuit of religious purity, but that thinking had to change when modern society was considered. People, on the whole, could pursue both things and they did that in modern society. The Spirit of Capitalism is the most important ideal in Weber’s book and it possesses the basic premise of a pursuit. People did not just desire the goods and the economic wealth; they desired the pursuit of such ventures. That particular wording of the theory brings it closer in line to what Karl Marx wrote about in his literature. It is interesting to consider that over time, Weber’s theory evolves from what he originally thought. As he becomes much deeper in his research of certain aspects of capitalistic society, he understands that religion does play a role in forming how people go after their economic goals, but it is not the only thing. Overriding that religious aspiration is the fact that modern society is a highly competitive place that will chew up people and spit them out if they are not careful. At some point, instinct takes over and individuals have to look out for their own good as opposed to doing the right thing and keeping with Protestant values while going after economic gains. An interesting comparison can be drawn between Weber and Marx when one considers their theory on the development of the modern world and how material possessions played a role in that. According to Weber, the most important way that possessions had an impact was that they caused people to do things that they normally would not do. Weber thought that the desire to work for material possessions took people completely out of their element. In a way, society changed the way that people worked and the way that people dealt with their friends and their family. Human beings, by nature, only want to do just enough to get by and just enough to have the things that they need. When personal possessions are out there to be had, people change their ways, though. Marx believed this to be true, as well, though he does not apply the basic religious principles in his thinking that Max Weber is so quick to apply. On the other hand, Marx always held on to the idea that material possessions changed the way people viewed the world. When faced with the prospect of having to make one’s own success in a capitalist society, people had the tendency to change their world view and make it meet their current situation. For some, this created a false sense of security and a false sense of reality. When people have their world view flipped on its head, it changes the way that they deal with other people and it changes the way that they make decisions in forming a society. Marx enjoyed arguing that Capitalism and the desire for possessions changed the way governments operated and the way that nations were formed. This basic premise is not wrong, as it has certainly bared itself true in many situations over the last one hundred years and change. Another important economic thinker that cannot be left out of the equation is Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He was a man who liked to come up with theories on the basic inner workings of human beings and how they think at a most basic state. His early research was on this fact and later, he came to develop ideas on the development of society. Rousseau makes a point in writings to analyze the role that personal property had on the development of human beings and as such, the development of modern society on the whole. In the beginning, man was content to operate on two basic premises. Human beings would do enough to ensure self-preservation and they would ultimately operate as a result of pity. Those were two basic ideas that eventually had to change as human beings learned to live together in a modern society. Then there was something different introduced into modern society. Someone decided that human beings must take possession of land and other things in society, as the entire dynamic had to change. All of a sudden, the things that were required for basic survival of human beings went from being just air, food, and water to being much more complicated than that. In fact, people had to learn to work in order to keep up with others in society and get the possessions that they learned to covet. That was not the whole of it, though. Human beings not only had to learn to love work in order to sustain themselves personally, they also had to learn to do enough work to sustain the whole body of society. This is an important idea and an important aspect of work that thinkers like Marx and Weber also kept in mind when they were writing down their particular policies. For Jean-Jacques Rousseau, people were not the only ones who were forced to change as a result of the introduction of private property into the equation. Society as a whole had to change to allow for the differences between human beings. Society became much more regimented and things became much more complicated than they had ever been before possessions played a role. In the early days of human society, the biggest and strongest individuals did all of the talking because they had all of the power. Now that possessions were necessary for survival, work became just as necessary. As Marx had mentioned in his writings, the desire to gain possessions was just as important as the material possessions themselves. Therefore, the smart and the shifty were now the people who were put into control. They instantly became more important than the strong folks that used to have complete control over society. That created a society that was broken down into two parts. The society that comes about as a result of private property is one that has a distinct class system. There are the haves and the â€Å"have nots†. Those with the land, money, and possessions are the ones who can impose their will on the people who are not lucky enough to have this type of control. According to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it takes the rich people with the possessions a little while to figure out that they have such power, but when they do, the results are somewhat catastrophic to society as a whole. The moral implications of this type of control are also worth keeping in mind. For the first time, people with the good things in life do their best to start deceiving the people without property. This is the first time that society begins to eat itself alive for the sake of personal property gain. For all three of these theorists, the connection between personal property and human inequality is a strong one. As mentioned before, Rousseau felt that when personal property became important for human society, people began to establish classes and the smart took over where the strong had once been in control. He felt very strongly that personal property was the cause of many of the ills of society that had not originally been in place when society was first being formed. Marx, on the other hand, did not have this strong of a feeling on the matter because his research and his theories were mostly based upon economic principles. He did feel that capitalism was destined to fail because the system would eventually collapse upon itself. Instead of people simply doing enough work for their own personal survival, people started doing work to gain more things than the person next to them. This important theme is one that turned society into a cut throat one. There was now a desire for people to get ahead of their neighbor when there was no other reason to do so. Max Weber understands that the search for new possessions and the ability to work for those things is an extremely important part of the development of society. Human nature is always shifting, so this was just one thing that eventually caused people to compete with one another. In one sense, it was bound to happen, but the creation of a class system happened more quickly because work and possessions came about in the newly forming society. The development of human society cannot be considered without also looking at the development of personal property and work. As Weber, Marx, and Rousseau brought to light in their research, society took a turn when personal property was introduced into the equation. Some felt that this change was for the worst, while others felt that the change was for the good, but it cannot be argued that personal property did nothing to the formation of modern society. When people realized that work and personal property were things that they had to do in order to survive, they began to work just as hard as they ate and just as hard as they breathed. Human nature is such that people will do whatever it takes to survive. That survival moved to include work and because of that, modern society changed in a profound way that no one could easily escape.

Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Terrorism - Essay Example Terrorism There are various factors which motivate terrorist groups to embark on violent missions towards innocent civilians. To begin with, revenge is one of the key motivations especially by a community which has suffered real or perceived injustices under an administration or a dominant society. For example, the US foreign policy towards the Arab countries in the Middle East has been perceived by terrorists as harsh towards people of Islamic faith (Hoffman, 2003). The country, being a super power, has in the past engaged its military in violent warfare in countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq among others which has been viewed by critics as a show of disrespect on the sovereignty of these Muslim nations. Consequently, movements such as the Al-Qaida are a culmination of such thought, which has planted the seed of hatred towards the Americans in general. It is for this reason among others that the US has continued to fall prey to terrorist attacks such as those of September 11, 2001, among others such as the twin bombing of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 whereby more than 200 people lost their lives (Hoffman, 2003). It may be interesting to find that Osama bin Laden was once an ally of the US during the fight against the Soviet Union’s invasion in Afghanistan but the American government did the mistake of invading Iraq during its war with Kuwait instead of letting the Arab nations find a solution for themselves. According to Osama, this indicated that the US did not have respect for the Muslim community and therefore had to be punished by declaring Jihad against it (Abbas, 2004). The need for revenge has led to formation of other terrorist groups such as the Black September Organization. The motivation behind the formation of this organization was to punish the then King Hussein of Jordan, who commissioned the killing and forced eviction of Palestinians by his army in 1970. The organization conducted series of attacks including that of the Mun ich massacre in 1972, which was supposed to make the world know of the plight of the Palestinians. They also hijacked aero planes for example the British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC) flight in September 1970 from which they freed the hostages and then blew it up in the full glare of the media (David, 2007). From this perspective, it may also be true to say that terrorism may also arise as a violent way of communication. This is due to the fact that most of the terrorists after committing an attack, they usually send signals through the media indicating their involvement and the reasons as to why they have taken such an action. The Islamic Jihad Union for example has constantly made it clear through the media that they are opposed to American’s interference with the affairs of the Arab world and to drive the point home, series of attacks have been directed at the US both as a revenge and a show of discontent (National Counter Terrorism Center, 2011). Violent communicati on in this context has been as a result of under reporting or not reporting at all the plight of marginalized groups and communities. The media has been noted as always being ready to report events that are of great magnitude especially those involving violence and giving little attention to these

Quality Management Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Quality Management Questions - Assignment Example An organization should understand that quality involves meeting and exceeding dynamic needs of all the groups. For example, the needs of consumers may be met by providing goods and services that are in line with customer’s needs and wants. On the contrary, the needs of external customers may be met by carrying out comprehensive marketing research to identify the specific needs of external customers and look for ways of meeting those needs better. Additionally, the needs of internal customers may be met and exceeded by obtaining feedback from the internal customers and applying the feedback obtained to carry out necessary continuous improvements (Evans & Lindsay, 2011). Edward Deming put forth the fourteen principles of effective quality management. Among the four major Deming philosophies that may be applied to improve learning and performance in the classroom, including the use of training on the job to ensuring that there is continuous improvement throughout the learning process, creation of constant of purpose, education implementation, and self-improvement. The philosophy of training on the job may be employed in the academic environment to ensure that learning and classroom performance has been improved. Learners should be equipped with the foundation knowledge to prepare them for intermediate and advanced areas of knowledge. Further learners should be allowed to form teamwork so that they can learn from each other. For example, learners may be given an opportunity to interact and discuss issues that they had learned in the classroom so that they can help each other to understand concepts that they didn't capture well in the classroom (Blanken ship & Peter, 1999). The second philosophy involves continuous improvement. This philosophy may be employed to improve performance through utilization of various tools in evaluating performance to determine whether there are some improvements.  

Leadership Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 30

Leadership - Essay Example Leadership styles encompass a combination of various aspects that leaders use in their interaction with employees including traits, skills, and behaviors. Therefore, to understand a leadership approach requires an understanding of the origin. Traits approach to leadership was the first ever-conceived idea of leadership. The theory has its foundations in believe that leaders are born, and thus have the innate abilities to lead. The theory borrowed from ancient leadership that allowed members of the royal family to lead one after another. Stogdill and Mann did the earliest survey on this leadership in 1948 and 1959 respectively and devised personality characteristics that differentiated leaders from followers (Doyle & Smith, 2012). A later study done by Wright proved that there are no special differences between leaders and the followers. He even proved that people with leadership traits will in most times not become leaders (Yukl, 2009). However, some of the traits common in almost al l leaders include task competence, physical vitality and stamina, intelligence and action-oriented judgment, people skills, and confidence. In addition, leaders are decisive, trustworthy, flexible, and ability to motivate their followers. Trait theory of leadership has some characteristic strength. One is that the theory depicts existence of innate abilities whereby individuals can re-examine their lives for leadership traits. In addition, they will go far in believing in themselves as part of the leadership family. Secondly, the theory depicts certain traits common in most successful leaders. This acts as a standard for practicing leaders to evaluate themselves. However, trait theory has various weaknesses that render it not of much use. First, not all inherited leaders were capable of offering good leadership. Many depended on some charisma in them but not real skills. In addition, some of the

Ethnography of Food Pantry Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethnography of Food Pantry - Personal Statement Example It was the 24th of March, and we had an appointment with one of the leading food pantry in our locality. We wanted to observe and research about a number of things which were going on there. Charles mumbled a total of twenty minutes as a given allowance, as he sensed that I was still in bed. In about fifteen minutes, I had already arrived at Angel’s coffee shop where we were all supposed to meet before we officially left for the appointment which was in the next two hours. You could tell from the anxiety on people’s faces that nobody wanted to be late. After a short meeting headed by our group supervisor, Ernest, we headed one of our school vans and in about ten minutes, we had our van parked in front of â€Å"St. Vincent de Paul Food Pantry† where we were meant to visit. I loved the color on the billboard; blue my favorite color ever since I was a toddler. I have spent over fifteen years in America, and I have been seeing this building as long as I can remember, but I have never taken my time to find out what really happens at the food pantry organization and how it works. I had a very mutual and exciting feeling as I walked in the organization. An exciting sensation kept tickling down my spine every time the thought of being a volunteer rang in my mind. My eyes fell on a number of benches and on them were several goods. This confirmed my happy feeling. There was a man who later introduced himself to us as Bob, who couldn’t keep his eyes off us. Surprisingly, he was the one who was waiting for us. As we approached, his firm stare turned into a soothing smile which made people’s hearts to feel at ease whenever we were with him. We introduced ourselves and immediately embarked on what we had come to do in the food pantry. It was a good experience seeing so many people young and old working together for the good of all in the working area. An equal amount of different foods were being in plastic bags. At the end of the line, there was a big heap of already packed foods waiting for the clients to come and pick them up. The different types of foods included pasta, tomato sauce, canned corn, vegetables, Mac-and-cheese and chocolates. There was no trace of protein in the packages. As we made our way into different rooms of the pantry foods, we came into the store room where there was a bid heap of donated food. He said that they had stayed there for long, and nobody wanted them. This was really surprising. We were then taken to a room with different sizes of fridges and in it was meat, both white and red. He requested two of us to remain behind so that they could pack the chicken in the polythene bags as it is done when packing food for the food pantry clients. Kevin and Alex volunteered to remain and do the tedious assignment. Kevin later confessed how frozen his hands felt when he was handling the meat. On the further corner was another fridge full of red meat and bread. They had been donated by different donors including organization and had come with different packages. Bob wanted them to have a similar type of package and requested three of us to work on it. I thought this was the place. The group supervisor, Ernest, Charles and I found ourselves working together. We were putting two packs of meat in every plastic bag. It seemed to be very easy to be a volunteer. I must confess that it was a little bit cold but what I was

Gangs in prisons Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Gangs in prisons - Essay Example The reasons of joining these gangs while in prisons are equally diversified and include the search for protection and in order to command control over all others. This study therefore intends to analyze the trends in prison gangs holistically within US, the reasons of their formation as well as the possible means of destroying them. The United States have increasingly been recording higher rates of gangs organized within the prisons over the last years (Sheldon, 2004). Both the increase in the number of gangs and gang members along with the increase in criminal activity by these individuals has lead to harsher responses by the criminal justice system including an increase in the incarceration of many gang members. For example, a study conducted in 1999 by prison administrators indicated that 24 percent of male prisoners and seven percent of female prisoners belong to a prison gang (Shelden, 2004). This was an approximately 167-percent increase in the number of prison gang members reported in 1991 whereby only nine percent of male and seven percent of female inmates reported belonging to a gang. In another study conducted in 1999 approximately 47,220 male were gang members in 1999 compared to a similar study in 1993 whereby 43,765 men were identified to be gang members in American prisons (a 7.9 percent increase ) (Shelden, Tracy & Brown, 2001). However, some states that have been identified with higher number of gangs in their prison population, for example Illinois, reported that as many as 34.3 percent of inmates belonged to a prison gang (Fleisher & Decker, 2001) which was the highest percent of prison gang-affiliated inmates in the nation. Despite the number of identified gang members in prisons, research on both the existence and the handling of gangs behind institutional walls is relatively nonexistent (Scott, 2001; Skarbek, 2012). Gangs exist in all prisons throughout United States (Fleisher & Decker, 2001).

Appreciation of western art Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Appreciation of western art - Essay Example There are three of them, one in the far left, the other in the middle and the other in the far right. Each of the three persons appear to be holding what seems like a hoe, and are all bending suggesting they are tilling. They appear to be doing the same thing but in an uncoordinated manner. This is apparent as they are all facing different directions. The person on the far left has his back facing us, the person on the middle faces the front while the person on the right faces sideways. Besides the people and the hoes they are holding, in the background there is what appears as a thick forest. At the middle ground there is a hill, this again is differentiated by the color variation and use of a different form. In the foreground, there is vegetation, again just as is the case with all the other forms this is also differentiated by the color and the form is not that clear. Art elements The two most important elements in this painting are color and form. The importance of these two elem ents is further brought to the fore given the genre of the painting. Fauvism as a form of art or genre of art was largely different from impressionism and cubism. Impressionism was keen in depicting reality and Cubism paid a lot more detail to form. Fauvism appears as a form that borrowed elements from these two genres. This is irrespective of the fact that Cubism was a genre that sought to address crucial elements that lacked in Fauvism. Form in a painting details the appearance; it represents a piece’s visible elements. These allow one to perceive and understand the painting or the entire artwork. In our chosen artwork, form is represented by different formal elements such as color, lines, mass, and shape. In terms of color, this will be largely discussed as a separate element in the following part it helps define form by identifying different objects within the artwork. The artist uses color to identify different objects. Choosing a different color for every object, this h elps create the forms of these objects and thus making it easier for the viewer to identify these objects. The color also helps identify transitions, from the foreground, to the middle ground and then to the background. These sections of the painting are painted in different colors and thus are very easy to identify. The other formal element is shape the artist uses different shapes to represent different objects within the painting. Lastly, the artist uses lines to represent different forms. These are used to signify transitions and mark appearance creating the linear orientation of these objects and also defining the different shapes within the artwork. Color Colors are a major part of this painting, with the artwork largely employing neutral colors, black, gray and brown. There are also dull shades of yellow and brown as well as an employment of a very dark shade of green at the background. The colors are mainly used to show transitions, the fore ground uses some shades of brown to show vegetation, this is followed by the color yellow that represents the middle ground representing what appears as a bare ground and there is the background that uses a very dark green shade creating an illusion of a thick forest. Colors black, grey, a slight yellow and brown is used to represent different objects mainly the people within the artwork. Shape Shape defines an enclosed space, the boundaries of this in the painting is defined by color and lines. Shape here refers to the space representing the people, the

Mergers & Acquisitions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1

Mergers & Acquisitions - Essay Example Merger usually takes place when two companies join together as one company and both companies cease to exist as separate entities and a new entity is formed as a result. The example of DaimlerChrysler is most suitable here because this new business concern was formed by the merger of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler. It is also believed that mergers take place among or between equals. Practically however, the two or more companies are not always on equal grounds. Some times the companies undergoing a deal call the association as merger while in actuality it is an acquisition. The deal is a merger or an acquisition also depends on the circumstances. Friendly or hostile nature of the deal also becomes important. Irrespective of its nature the business deals of this kind greatly affect the board of directors, employees and shareholders. Apart from the distinction of mergers there also exist different forms of mergers. For example horizontal merger is one when companies sharing sharethe same product lines and markets join hands. When supplier and company merge it is termed vertical merger. Conglomeration happens when companies having different businesses come together. There re different reason given for the mergers and acquisition among companies but three hypotheses are very well known practically as well as theoretically. The synergy hypothesis, hubris hypothesis and managerialism hypothesis have been studied and different observations made regarding them. "The synergy hypothesis proposes that acquisitions take place when the value of the combined firm is greater than the sum of the values of the individual firms. Managers are assumed to be motivated by shareholders' interests to create economic value, and to have the ability to judge accurately the value potential of the combined firm. Other explanations do not assume value-maximizing behavior on the part of managers. The managerialism hypothesis suggests that managers embark on acquisitions to maximize their own utility at the expense of the shareholders of the firm. The hubris hypothesis suggests that bidding firm managers make mistakes in evaluating target firms, but undertake acquisitions presuming that their valuations are correct" (Pettit, Seth & Song, 2000). Synergy Hypothesis Two companies joined together may create the effect of three not two is the reason why most companies choose the path of mergers & acquisitions. The synergy is considered one of the main reasons. By mergers and acquisitions the companies seek to create more value for the shareholders. Synergy gets many benefits for the engaging companies. Most important benefits come in the form of revenue augmentation and cost savings. Due to staff reductions the company gets to save a lot. Especially, when one of the two CEO leaves the company with other employees they also forgo their expensive compensation packages causing huge reduction in costs. Economies of scales can be achieved by two companies together than separately. Relationship with suppliers also improves when stronger and larger groups negotiate. When placing orders for the company management can have a stronger position and as result could get better bargain. Some companies achieve an edge in a particular area by acquiring or merging another company. For example a small company having an edge in IT or any other scope of